Typically procedural scenery is based on the idea of 'amplifying data' - that is, making a little bit of data look more interesting by applying a recursive algorithm to "generate" detail. Every single building there was custom made by antwob, the scenery author.Signing-up for PRO gives you super fast, unrestricted speed to the thousands of MSFS, FSX, P3D & X-Plane downloads which include aircraft, scenery. Pictures can hardly do justice to this fantastic GA airfield located in Hamar, a small town in Norway with around 27,593 inhabitants as of 2006. ENHA - Hamar Stafsberg, Norway. There're great freeware sceneries developed by the X-Plane.org - community and the only Finnish X-Plane scenery design group : TruScenery.There is a fundamental difference between what you see with Outerra and what we do with our global scenery:A list with some of the best freeware General Aviation airports ever developed for X-Plane 11.
...
X Plane Scenery List Install Scenery For
Furthermore, as mentioned, it simply doesn't make sense to try and provide a worlds worth of 1m resolution terrain data if the user is only going to be exposed to it 1% of 1% of their simming time.So the answer, in my opinion, is to extend the principle of procedural data adding value to algorithmic data via the use of fractal terrain generation at very small view distances.Obviously, people want to fly over 'real' terrain, and algorithmic data can provide that by converting DTMs and land classification data, but different fractals can be tied to different land classes to generate the sub 100m detail. LiDaR derived terrain, high res aerial imagery), however, is not.in fact it is quite slow and expensive when you can get it.So we are faced with the problem of having the ability to present highly accurate information to the user, but not actually possessing the data to generate it in many cases. The collection and dissemination of highly accurate real world data (I.e. Basically, changing the default from water to low-res scenery.As mentioned, the choice is not between one OR the other, it is a choice of the mix between the two.My take on it, as a MSFS scenery developer (who intends to look into X-Plane after the release of my latest scenery project for New Zealand) is this:Data storage capability and processing power are increasing fairly much in line with Moores Law. Multiple detail levels would allow for a bit more of a "happy medium."A slightly less complex version of this might be to leave things as they are now (where you select which areas to install scenery for), but have one additional option to use a bit more disk space to install low-res scenery for the rest of the world, or install none at all (as it is now). And I'd still like to have very basic scenery for the rest of the world.As it is now, I have to make the tradeoff of either installing scenery for the whole world and using up massive amounts of disk space for something I'll rarely use, or completely limiting myself to a smaller set of areas I did install scenery for.
Does Sponge Bob Square Pants Need Wake Turbulence. A landclass of forest will link to a slightly different fractal representative of under-canopy terrain.Given the relatively small overhead (?), I think this would be the logical next step for FS development.
0 kommentar(er)
